Thursday, September 21, 2006
NO to a Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street: Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 A
AADHIKARONLINE
London Thursday 21 September 2006
The 4th Edition published from London at 1300 Hrs GMT / 1400 Hrs UK time on Thursday 21 September 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
Moral and legal statement about the materials published here and about access and references to them All materials published here are originally created and authored unless otherwise stated [eg external links and comparable evidence of participation or contribution by other authoring and analytical sources] publishing these online editions in association with KHOODEELAAR! The BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole tunnel plot scheme plan Bill attacks on the East End of London
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION
[1980 - 2006]
Language note: The word AADHIKAR means RIGHTS in several major Asian languages. The word Aadhikar was introduced into English by Muhammad Haque in December 1980. The spelling with two 'a's had not been seen in the context before. It was first published as part of the title and description of the weekly AADHIKAR on Monday 19 December 1980
LINKS:
• View HERE the main web site of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole… Bill campaign [Khoodeelaar.com]
• AADHIKARonline some recent editions
NO to a Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street: Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area at 3 PM on Friday 22 September 2006
Details
Gather outside the ‘Brady Centre’ in Hanbury Street at 2.30 PM
Demo starts at 3 PM with updates on the campaign against CrossRail hole.
1. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Reports, including focussing on what any of the ‘elected’ post holders in the name of the East End has done to oppose Crossrail in the period under review
2. The ‘local paper’ the East London Idiotiser has lied for Crossrail again.
How is it that the crooks who brought into the East End the Crossrail hole attack, expected to get away with letting the community down, destroying vital parts of the area?
By assuming that the ‘local paper’ the East London advertiser, would take another century to catch up with the pace and the plan, that is how ! And so it is proving, the Idiotiser simply cannot get the facts. Or it cannot tell the truth of what is going on. It is forever shielding the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and totally unwisely over-hyping the alleged salvation of the area by ‘councillors’ ! There is no feting of the community Campaign against Crossrail in then Idiotiser. Whenever the Idiotiser has apparently ‘reported’ on the Campaign against CrossRail, it has got key facts unforgivably misinformed, confusing and muddled up. May be there has been an agenda active in that too!
The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006
Review of the local Council and of the local paper the East London Idiotiser!
By Muhammad Haque
1200 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 September 2006
It has suppressed the fact that for days now Khoodeelaar! has been publicising the demonstration to be held against Crossrail on Friday 22 September 230067. In order to make it plausible that it is not misreporting, the Idiotiser carries two pieces on the topic of CrossRail but both of those are stuffed full of falsehoods and misinformation.
The Idiotiser contents further analysed at 1220 hrs GMT Thursday 21 September 2006 Crossrail forced to alter plans!
This is another typically false heading to an even more false 'report'.
The 'report's is empty of substance and is as usual contradictory.
Why?
Because it is a dishonest cover to give even more plugs to Crassrail, so that, there is another advertisement in the paper from the CLRL and its corrupt backers.
The Idiotiser uses words like 'forced' without evidence.
Big Business and 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are mixed up!
Or perhaps the Idiotiser 'knows' something we do not - that may be some of its unnamed collective 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are indeed in league with Big Business!
Who are these ‘campaigners’ that the Idiotiser does not name?
What are they campaigning on and about ?
Ion what evidence does the Idiotiser refer to them as ‘campaigners’ and on what date or dates did they do the alleged campaigning ?
How else could the Idiotiser print a stupid 'report' like that!
Only if the Idiotiser wanted to lie to the ordinary readers and deny the fact that Khoodeelaar! The Idiotiser has room for advertising the CLRL stunt but has no inclination to admit the truth about the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole campaign.
The central analytical premiss in the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been, long before the formal launch of the Campaign in January 2004, that the Crossrail hole plan is fundamentally flawed and that it was flawed in so far as the massive and long lasting negative impact on the community because it was devised to meet the demands for profit that Big Business represented.
The Idiotiser in its latest edition [Thursday 21 September 2006] has given space to the topic of Crossrail under pressure from the community. But it has signally failed to tell the truth .
It has done bits here, bits there, including giving almost a page to a ‘campaigner’ near the Whitechapel station. But it has refused to tell the truth about the CRASSrail.
Now, it has accommodate4d the CrossRail hole Bill tout John Biggs in a disguise that Biggs is wearing as a ‘concerned’ member on the GLA. That concern is false as is everything that Biggs has entered in his career as a Blairist self-seeker and time-server.
But the Idiotiser will not let readers have any knowledge of Biggs’ role in bring the CrossRail hole into the East End.
Just like the Idiotiser will not tell the truth that Christine Gilbert was repeatedly called a liar in the Council chamber and that neither the ‘chair ‘ of the meeting nor a single member of the Council on either side of the so-called divide said a single thing in refuting that charge that Gilbert was a liar.
How dare the Idiotiser prance about plugging the lying Council clique as if it has been thanked by any genuine member of the community engaged in defending the community against any of the clique’s attacks?
In any case, there is NO councillor who has initiated and sustained ANY campaign in the corrupt cliqued Council on any side.
Whoever the Idiotiser may dig up will turn out to have been a product of some other elements and organisations.
So to again parade the idea of ‘councillor’ as a superior source of opinion or action is doubly contaminating and corrupt.
It is the community that has the priority and should be given it every time the Idiotiser pretends to be reporting about the conduct of the council.
The Idiotiser must also beware: do not behave corruptly and do not do ‘personal favours’ to ‘selected campaigners’ about whom the Idiotiser decision-making ;’editorial’ [!] personnel may be operating some strange ‘priority’!!!
3. Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole mayor Ken Lyingstill Livingstone – an update on the latest Crassness by careerist Ken
4. Why CrossRail hole Christine Gilbert should have been sacked from Tower Hamlets Council and why that display [in the 'FOOL Council' staged on Wednesday 13 September 2006 in the 'Council Chamber'] of ‘opposition grouplette leaders’ oozing praise for Gilbert was a disgraceful abuse of the councillors’ positions….. Why those ‘opposition councillors’ owe an apology to all the people let down and violated by Christine Gilbert in Tower Hamlets over the past years that she has been in the post as ‘chief executive’…
5. How CROSSRAIL hole was INVITED to Tower Hamlets by the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council which has been allowed to CREATE additional poverty in the East End by its corrupt agenda and by its collusion with the most corrupt elements in the area both brought into Tower Hamlets by some of the crooks with 'influence' over the corrupt councillors belonging to the corrupt clique in control of the Council and by other illicit ways...Why Crossrail hole will spell disaster for so many families, so many young people, so many senior persons and for the entire social and economic lives of the people in the community in the East End of London... And why Crossrail is NOT needed by the local economy...
6. Will the ‘Opposition’ councillors show any morality to call for the sacking of the corrupt employees including some in the Tower Hamlets Council's planning operations who are directly abusing their employment in the Council and must be working to the agenda of multi-national corporations and Big business who want to go through the planning formalities so they can make the local people even more deprived than the people already are and so that the Big Business muggers can embark on making huge and illegitimate profits while they deplete the stock in public control of the buildings and amenities that should be made usable by the ordinary people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets? Or are all the RELEVANT ‘opposition’ ‘councillors’ so morally compromised by their own corrupt deals here and there, by their recent corrupt deals etc that they do not have the courage to speak out against crooked agents of Big Business installed within Tower Hamlets Council?
The Brighton Postcard has now been postponed due to the Khoodeelaar! breaking commentary and Campaign reports
Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against CrossRail stunt in Hanbury Street – revised time for gathering outside Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 on Friday 22 September 2006: Gather outside the Brady Centre at 2.30 PM [1430 hrs Local time] Friday 22 September 2006
1. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 report by Muhammad Haque at 2030 hrs GMT Wednesday 20 September 2006
John Biggs speaking out against Crossrail ! Pass on the sick bag! Even better if Biggs has the courage and the conviction to support the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against Crassrail outside the Brady Centre on 22 September 2006 .
M
Somehow he won’t support the demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street on Friday … This is because of Biggs’ failure to tell the truth about the crassness of CrossRail that he has been aware of. Or rather, has been made aware of all along… I recall trying, in vain, to get the corrupt ‘ executive’ committee members on the then GMC [General management Committee!] of the former Labour Party remnants in Bethnal Green to have an open and detailed discussion on the Crassrail plan as it was being promoted within the Blaired sections of the former Labour Party…But they were deaf to reason… They lost the ability to see.. and they lied through their every known presumed human thinking [!] faculty… And for what! How many of those immoral time servers have anything to show by way of anything they have done in their pathetic careeristic times within the Blaired party that makes any difference for the better for the community in whose name they constantly and only make pathetic careeristic points? Those bureaucrats backed Biggs overtime that I sought to create an intelligent debate within the Blaired bureaucracy. Biggs is on the Greater London Assembly because there is no political organisation of any party. Least of all, there is no politically active Labour Party in the Borough. What there is in its place is a soulless, morality- free Blaired organism that has taken over the former Labour party… Biggs is a small time careerist. He has not shown any morality,. Any vision. Any anything… He is only now making the pathetic noise because there are other facts at stake and he is clarity enough to know which way the political wind is likely to bow.. so he can move with it and keep his pathetic career, for now at the GLA. Ghastly Lying Apparatus. Biggs should be held to account by the East End and we intend to make sure that Biggs does not get away with the latest round of lying for Crossrail…We shall be focussing on the strange allegedly anti-CrossRail allegedly campaigning prances and other disgracefully tokenistic, insincere, unrepresentative [context. context] conduct by the Blaring crooks at the expense of the community in the ordinary p[arts of Bow East…
2. Why has Christine Gilbert been lying to and against the community in the East End of London? Who authorised Christine Gilbert to sabotage e-mail communications? Who told Christine Gilbert that she could show two fingers to the people in whose name she has been making so much cash and collecting so many career points for herself over the past decade or so?
3. Why has ‘Brick Lane’ Councillor Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ been silent on the CrossRail hole in the Hanbury Street?
4. Who told Michael Keith’s ‘ethnic’ ‘mate’ to say that the people would not oppose Crossrail if the facts were explained to the people? What is there to explain about a hole that will disrupt essential traffic of customers and community in the area for anything upto two years? What is there to explain about a hole that will cause serious noise pollution for as long? What is there to explain about a hole that will only sink small business in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1, turning Hanbury Street into a blighted wasteland? …Who briefed that ‘community’ ‘leader’ to parrot their racist Crossrail-hole-inviting ‘friend’?
[To be continued]
1. Muhammad Haque's questions to Tory Chair Francis Maude - April 2006: Has Francis Maude behaved any better than Alistair Darling over CrossRail hole in Brick Lane? - a review here soon
2. Lib Dems or Lib Dumbs! What is all this 'ladies' shouting sexually suggestive statements in the so-called political conference! Is this a party fit to claim it is any better than the Sleazeball setup that Blair has created in the formerly known Labour Party? - an ethical report on the adulterous outrages at Brighton Lib Dems outing
From the previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
3. BRIGHTON POSTCARD! Crossrail Chris Huhne! What a plonker! He is claiming that his ‘party’ is almost ready to grab the formal political power in the UK! Does that make him a plonker?
The Muhammad Haque Daily Political Commentary 1700 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 19 September 2006
No, it doesn’t! except that Chris the obscenely overrated Huhne is not capable of understanding the full facts of office. Not as far as any legitimate claim he may make to being different from the lying Blairing regime or the creepy Cameron variety. Chris Huhne hasn’t got the moral integrity to claim that he deserved the trust of the people any more than any of the incumbents in various offices of the UK state do… So what is the link? The link is that a few months back, before they plunged into the latest annual grotesque indulgence of the summer recess, the so-called MPs including Huhne got into an exchange of sorts.
According to the sources that Khoodeelaar! regularly examines as part of our constitutional law work against Crossrail, we came across what looked like Huhne’s having made a small statement about Crossrail. Literally, that published statement was incredibly fudgy and confusing.
It showed Huhne's lack of the requisite knowledge of the subject. Or his statement was so mercilessly misstated that it immediately warranted a fact-checker communication. Without checking the alleged facts about his utterance, we would not be commenting on what he had to then say about Crossrail or about the macro economy. Or about the wider environment of planet earth. . As is the established ethical tradition of this KHOODEELAAR! campaigning publication, we wrote to Huhne. Asking him to first of all confirm the attributed statement. And then we would have followed up with a few original questions about the Crass role that his so-called leadership had played in plugging for the CRASSRAIL project. So what did Huhne have to say? Nought. He did not even bother to acknowledge the communication. Far less to show any appreciation of the fact that we took the trouble to ask him to confirm the statement… Now what does that show? Does that show that Huhne bothers about what he must have been given to believe a small local grouping in the East End of London? Or does it show that he is so up-to-date with what the WHOLE community of people across the UK is on about that he does indeed deserve to be taken very seriously as the man that should be in charge of making mega decisions on behalf of the people on the matters of serious environmental and economic and social import?
[To be continued]
The previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
AADHIKARonline
publishing programme for Tuesday 19 September 2006
1. Khoodeelaar! protest demonstration against Crossrail hole company , 3PM Friday 22 September 2006 outside the Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 [More details during the next 3 days on this site and on http://www.khoodeelaar.com]
2. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 reports [continued] What do Tower Hamlets Council ‘opposition’ ‘groups’ say against corrupt links between ‘councillors’ and employees/agents of the Tower Hamlets Council? Do the ‘opposition’ councillors have ANY position against corruption? If so, what is that position? If there is a stated position or a position that can be stated, when and where was that last published for the people in the East End of London?
3. By Muhammad Haque London 1220 Hrs GMT Tuesday 19 September 2006
Why did Crossrail-hole-mayor ‘Shafiqul’ state a threat to ‘permanently ban’ anyone who made a racist remark in the Council chamber on 13 September 2006? Wasn’t’ he obliged under the rules and the constitution and legally to show to all present what evidence he was basing his apparently anti-racist utterance on? Or was that another of the corrupt clique’s ploys to abuse the Council chamber in order to deter genuine contributions against the corrupt clique's corrupt conduct? Since when had the corrupt racist clique on Tower Hamlets Council become so concerned AGAINST racism? Will the Blairing time-servers who gave ‘mayor’ Shafiqul the partisan, sleazy prod to make that utterance identify what racist remark they were referring to? Or will they, - - in the event of their predictable failure and or refusal to substantiate the presumed factual basis underlying that stunt- apologise to the people of the East End for abusing the name of the East End population and electorate in furthering the petty, corrupt, careers of the time-serving Blairing post-holders themselves?
4. The further evidence of the corrupt agenda behind the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the post of ‘chief executive’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
5. Whatever happened to the ‘campaign against corruption’ that had been so loudly announced by George Galloway the ‘leader’ of the RESPECT grouping?
6. Breaking news on the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against CrossRail
7. How Tower Hamlets Council has been CREATING poverty in the ‘deprived’ East End of London
8. How Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy lied about ‘funding’ ‘community organisation’s – the truth about the CORRUPT practice of Tower Hamlets Council under ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert
9. Postcard from Brighton ? How glossy is the attached image?
London Thursday 21 September 2006
The 4th Edition published from London at 1300 Hrs GMT / 1400 Hrs UK time on Thursday 21 September 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
Moral and legal statement about the materials published here and about access and references to them All materials published here are originally created and authored unless otherwise stated [eg external links and comparable evidence of participation or contribution by other authoring and analytical sources] publishing these online editions in association with KHOODEELAAR! The BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole tunnel plot scheme plan Bill attacks on the East End of London
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION
[1980 - 2006]
Language note: The word AADHIKAR means RIGHTS in several major Asian languages. The word Aadhikar was introduced into English by Muhammad Haque in December 1980. The spelling with two 'a's had not been seen in the context before. It was first published as part of the title and description of the weekly AADHIKAR on Monday 19 December 1980
LINKS:
• View HERE the main web site of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole… Bill campaign [Khoodeelaar.com]
• AADHIKARonline some recent editions
NO to a Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street: Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1 Area at 3 PM on Friday 22 September 2006
Details
Gather outside the ‘Brady Centre’ in Hanbury Street at 2.30 PM
Demo starts at 3 PM with updates on the campaign against CrossRail hole.
1. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Reports, including focussing on what any of the ‘elected’ post holders in the name of the East End has done to oppose Crossrail in the period under review
2. The ‘local paper’ the East London Idiotiser has lied for Crossrail again.
How is it that the crooks who brought into the East End the Crossrail hole attack, expected to get away with letting the community down, destroying vital parts of the area?
By assuming that the ‘local paper’ the East London advertiser, would take another century to catch up with the pace and the plan, that is how ! And so it is proving, the Idiotiser simply cannot get the facts. Or it cannot tell the truth of what is going on. It is forever shielding the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and totally unwisely over-hyping the alleged salvation of the area by ‘councillors’ ! There is no feting of the community Campaign against Crossrail in then Idiotiser. Whenever the Idiotiser has apparently ‘reported’ on the Campaign against CrossRail, it has got key facts unforgivably misinformed, confusing and muddled up. May be there has been an agenda active in that too!
The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006
Review of the local Council and of the local paper the East London Idiotiser!
By Muhammad Haque
1200 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 September 2006
It has suppressed the fact that for days now Khoodeelaar! has been publicising the demonstration to be held against Crossrail on Friday 22 September 230067. In order to make it plausible that it is not misreporting, the Idiotiser carries two pieces on the topic of CrossRail but both of those are stuffed full of falsehoods and misinformation.
The Idiotiser contents further analysed at 1220 hrs GMT Thursday 21 September 2006 Crossrail forced to alter plans!
This is another typically false heading to an even more false 'report'.
The 'report's is empty of substance and is as usual contradictory.
Why?
Because it is a dishonest cover to give even more plugs to Crassrail, so that, there is another advertisement in the paper from the CLRL and its corrupt backers.
The Idiotiser uses words like 'forced' without evidence.
Big Business and 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are mixed up!
Or perhaps the Idiotiser 'knows' something we do not - that may be some of its unnamed collective 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are indeed in league with Big Business!
Who are these ‘campaigners’ that the Idiotiser does not name?
What are they campaigning on and about ?
Ion what evidence does the Idiotiser refer to them as ‘campaigners’ and on what date or dates did they do the alleged campaigning ?
How else could the Idiotiser print a stupid 'report' like that!
Only if the Idiotiser wanted to lie to the ordinary readers and deny the fact that Khoodeelaar! The Idiotiser has room for advertising the CLRL stunt but has no inclination to admit the truth about the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole campaign.
The central analytical premiss in the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been, long before the formal launch of the Campaign in January 2004, that the Crossrail hole plan is fundamentally flawed and that it was flawed in so far as the massive and long lasting negative impact on the community because it was devised to meet the demands for profit that Big Business represented.
The Idiotiser in its latest edition [Thursday 21 September 2006] has given space to the topic of Crossrail under pressure from the community. But it has signally failed to tell the truth .
It has done bits here, bits there, including giving almost a page to a ‘campaigner’ near the Whitechapel station. But it has refused to tell the truth about the CRASSrail.
Now, it has accommodate4d the CrossRail hole Bill tout John Biggs in a disguise that Biggs is wearing as a ‘concerned’ member on the GLA. That concern is false as is everything that Biggs has entered in his career as a Blairist self-seeker and time-server.
But the Idiotiser will not let readers have any knowledge of Biggs’ role in bring the CrossRail hole into the East End.
Just like the Idiotiser will not tell the truth that Christine Gilbert was repeatedly called a liar in the Council chamber and that neither the ‘chair ‘ of the meeting nor a single member of the Council on either side of the so-called divide said a single thing in refuting that charge that Gilbert was a liar.
How dare the Idiotiser prance about plugging the lying Council clique as if it has been thanked by any genuine member of the community engaged in defending the community against any of the clique’s attacks?
In any case, there is NO councillor who has initiated and sustained ANY campaign in the corrupt cliqued Council on any side.
Whoever the Idiotiser may dig up will turn out to have been a product of some other elements and organisations.
So to again parade the idea of ‘councillor’ as a superior source of opinion or action is doubly contaminating and corrupt.
It is the community that has the priority and should be given it every time the Idiotiser pretends to be reporting about the conduct of the council.
The Idiotiser must also beware: do not behave corruptly and do not do ‘personal favours’ to ‘selected campaigners’ about whom the Idiotiser decision-making ;’editorial’ [!] personnel may be operating some strange ‘priority’!!!
3. Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole mayor Ken Lyingstill Livingstone – an update on the latest Crassness by careerist Ken
4. Why CrossRail hole Christine Gilbert should have been sacked from Tower Hamlets Council and why that display [in the 'FOOL Council' staged on Wednesday 13 September 2006 in the 'Council Chamber'] of ‘opposition grouplette leaders’ oozing praise for Gilbert was a disgraceful abuse of the councillors’ positions….. Why those ‘opposition councillors’ owe an apology to all the people let down and violated by Christine Gilbert in Tower Hamlets over the past years that she has been in the post as ‘chief executive’…
5. How CROSSRAIL hole was INVITED to Tower Hamlets by the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council which has been allowed to CREATE additional poverty in the East End by its corrupt agenda and by its collusion with the most corrupt elements in the area both brought into Tower Hamlets by some of the crooks with 'influence' over the corrupt councillors belonging to the corrupt clique in control of the Council and by other illicit ways...Why Crossrail hole will spell disaster for so many families, so many young people, so many senior persons and for the entire social and economic lives of the people in the community in the East End of London... And why Crossrail is NOT needed by the local economy...
6. Will the ‘Opposition’ councillors show any morality to call for the sacking of the corrupt employees including some in the Tower Hamlets Council's planning operations who are directly abusing their employment in the Council and must be working to the agenda of multi-national corporations and Big business who want to go through the planning formalities so they can make the local people even more deprived than the people already are and so that the Big Business muggers can embark on making huge and illegitimate profits while they deplete the stock in public control of the buildings and amenities that should be made usable by the ordinary people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets? Or are all the RELEVANT ‘opposition’ ‘councillors’ so morally compromised by their own corrupt deals here and there, by their recent corrupt deals etc that they do not have the courage to speak out against crooked agents of Big Business installed within Tower Hamlets Council?
The Brighton Postcard has now been postponed due to the Khoodeelaar! breaking commentary and Campaign reports
Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against CrossRail stunt in Hanbury Street – revised time for gathering outside Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 on Friday 22 September 2006: Gather outside the Brady Centre at 2.30 PM [1430 hrs Local time] Friday 22 September 2006
1. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 report by Muhammad Haque at 2030 hrs GMT Wednesday 20 September 2006
John Biggs speaking out against Crossrail ! Pass on the sick bag! Even better if Biggs has the courage and the conviction to support the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against Crassrail outside the Brady Centre on 22 September 2006 .
M
Somehow he won’t support the demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street on Friday … This is because of Biggs’ failure to tell the truth about the crassness of CrossRail that he has been aware of. Or rather, has been made aware of all along… I recall trying, in vain, to get the corrupt ‘ executive’ committee members on the then GMC [General management Committee!] of the former Labour Party remnants in Bethnal Green to have an open and detailed discussion on the Crassrail plan as it was being promoted within the Blaired sections of the former Labour Party…But they were deaf to reason… They lost the ability to see.. and they lied through their every known presumed human thinking [!] faculty… And for what! How many of those immoral time servers have anything to show by way of anything they have done in their pathetic careeristic times within the Blaired party that makes any difference for the better for the community in whose name they constantly and only make pathetic careeristic points? Those bureaucrats backed Biggs overtime that I sought to create an intelligent debate within the Blaired bureaucracy. Biggs is on the Greater London Assembly because there is no political organisation of any party. Least of all, there is no politically active Labour Party in the Borough. What there is in its place is a soulless, morality- free Blaired organism that has taken over the former Labour party… Biggs is a small time careerist. He has not shown any morality,. Any vision. Any anything… He is only now making the pathetic noise because there are other facts at stake and he is clarity enough to know which way the political wind is likely to bow.. so he can move with it and keep his pathetic career, for now at the GLA. Ghastly Lying Apparatus. Biggs should be held to account by the East End and we intend to make sure that Biggs does not get away with the latest round of lying for Crossrail…We shall be focussing on the strange allegedly anti-CrossRail allegedly campaigning prances and other disgracefully tokenistic, insincere, unrepresentative [context. context] conduct by the Blaring crooks at the expense of the community in the ordinary p[arts of Bow East…
2. Why has Christine Gilbert been lying to and against the community in the East End of London? Who authorised Christine Gilbert to sabotage e-mail communications? Who told Christine Gilbert that she could show two fingers to the people in whose name she has been making so much cash and collecting so many career points for herself over the past decade or so?
3. Why has ‘Brick Lane’ Councillor Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ been silent on the CrossRail hole in the Hanbury Street?
4. Who told Michael Keith’s ‘ethnic’ ‘mate’ to say that the people would not oppose Crossrail if the facts were explained to the people? What is there to explain about a hole that will disrupt essential traffic of customers and community in the area for anything upto two years? What is there to explain about a hole that will cause serious noise pollution for as long? What is there to explain about a hole that will only sink small business in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1, turning Hanbury Street into a blighted wasteland? …Who briefed that ‘community’ ‘leader’ to parrot their racist Crossrail-hole-inviting ‘friend’?
[To be continued]
1. Muhammad Haque's questions to Tory Chair Francis Maude - April 2006: Has Francis Maude behaved any better than Alistair Darling over CrossRail hole in Brick Lane? - a review here soon
2. Lib Dems or Lib Dumbs! What is all this 'ladies' shouting sexually suggestive statements in the so-called political conference! Is this a party fit to claim it is any better than the Sleazeball setup that Blair has created in the formerly known Labour Party? - an ethical report on the adulterous outrages at Brighton Lib Dems outing
From the previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
3. BRIGHTON POSTCARD! Crossrail Chris Huhne! What a plonker! He is claiming that his ‘party’ is almost ready to grab the formal political power in the UK! Does that make him a plonker?
The Muhammad Haque Daily Political Commentary 1700 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 19 September 2006
No, it doesn’t! except that Chris the obscenely overrated Huhne is not capable of understanding the full facts of office. Not as far as any legitimate claim he may make to being different from the lying Blairing regime or the creepy Cameron variety. Chris Huhne hasn’t got the moral integrity to claim that he deserved the trust of the people any more than any of the incumbents in various offices of the UK state do… So what is the link? The link is that a few months back, before they plunged into the latest annual grotesque indulgence of the summer recess, the so-called MPs including Huhne got into an exchange of sorts.
According to the sources that Khoodeelaar! regularly examines as part of our constitutional law work against Crossrail, we came across what looked like Huhne’s having made a small statement about Crossrail. Literally, that published statement was incredibly fudgy and confusing.
It showed Huhne's lack of the requisite knowledge of the subject. Or his statement was so mercilessly misstated that it immediately warranted a fact-checker communication. Without checking the alleged facts about his utterance, we would not be commenting on what he had to then say about Crossrail or about the macro economy. Or about the wider environment of planet earth. . As is the established ethical tradition of this KHOODEELAAR! campaigning publication, we wrote to Huhne. Asking him to first of all confirm the attributed statement. And then we would have followed up with a few original questions about the Crass role that his so-called leadership had played in plugging for the CRASSRAIL project. So what did Huhne have to say? Nought. He did not even bother to acknowledge the communication. Far less to show any appreciation of the fact that we took the trouble to ask him to confirm the statement… Now what does that show? Does that show that Huhne bothers about what he must have been given to believe a small local grouping in the East End of London? Or does it show that he is so up-to-date with what the WHOLE community of people across the UK is on about that he does indeed deserve to be taken very seriously as the man that should be in charge of making mega decisions on behalf of the people on the matters of serious environmental and economic and social import?
[To be continued]
The previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
AADHIKARonline
publishing programme for Tuesday 19 September 2006
1. Khoodeelaar! protest demonstration against Crossrail hole company , 3PM Friday 22 September 2006 outside the Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 [More details during the next 3 days on this site and on http://www.khoodeelaar.com]
2. Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 reports [continued] What do Tower Hamlets Council ‘opposition’ ‘groups’ say against corrupt links between ‘councillors’ and employees/agents of the Tower Hamlets Council? Do the ‘opposition’ councillors have ANY position against corruption? If so, what is that position? If there is a stated position or a position that can be stated, when and where was that last published for the people in the East End of London?
3. By Muhammad Haque London 1220 Hrs GMT Tuesday 19 September 2006
Why did Crossrail-hole-mayor ‘Shafiqul’ state a threat to ‘permanently ban’ anyone who made a racist remark in the Council chamber on 13 September 2006? Wasn’t’ he obliged under the rules and the constitution and legally to show to all present what evidence he was basing his apparently anti-racist utterance on? Or was that another of the corrupt clique’s ploys to abuse the Council chamber in order to deter genuine contributions against the corrupt clique's corrupt conduct? Since when had the corrupt racist clique on Tower Hamlets Council become so concerned AGAINST racism? Will the Blairing time-servers who gave ‘mayor’ Shafiqul the partisan, sleazy prod to make that utterance identify what racist remark they were referring to? Or will they, - - in the event of their predictable failure and or refusal to substantiate the presumed factual basis underlying that stunt- apologise to the people of the East End for abusing the name of the East End population and electorate in furthering the petty, corrupt, careers of the time-serving Blairing post-holders themselves?
4. The further evidence of the corrupt agenda behind the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the post of ‘chief executive’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
5. Whatever happened to the ‘campaign against corruption’ that had been so loudly announced by George Galloway the ‘leader’ of the RESPECT grouping?
6. Breaking news on the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against CrossRail
7. How Tower Hamlets Council has been CREATING poverty in the ‘deprived’ East End of London
8. How Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy lied about ‘funding’ ‘community organisation’s – the truth about the CORRUPT practice of Tower Hamlets Council under ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert
9. Postcard from Brighton ? How glossy is the attached image?
Muhammad Haque daily political commentary: focussing on Crossrail corrupting East London
AADHIKARONLINE
London Thursday 21 September 2006 2006
The 4th Edition published from London at 1300 Hrs GMT / 1400 Hrs UK time on Thursday 21 September 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
Moral and legal statement about the materials published here and about access and references to them All materials published here are originally created and authored unless otherwise stated [eg external links and comparable evidence of participation or contribution by other authoring and analytical sources] publishing these online editions in association with KHOODEELAAR! The BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole tunnel plot scheme plan Bill attacks on the East End of London
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION
[1980 - 2006]
Language note: The word AADHIKAR means RIGHTS in several major Asian languages. The word Aadhikar was introduced into English by Muhammad Haque in December 1980. The spelling with two 'a's had not been seen in the context before. It was first published as part of the title and description of the weekly AADHIKAR on Monday 19 December 1980
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINKS:
View HERE the main web site of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole… Bill campaign [Khoodeelaar.com]
AADHIKARonline some recent editions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO to a Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street: Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail in hanbury Street at 3 PM on Friday 22 September 2006
Details of the demo: Gather outside the ‘Brady Centre’ in Hanbury Street at 2.30 PM
Demo starts at 3 PM with updates on the campaign against CrossRail hole.
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Reports, including focussing on what any of the ‘elected’ postholders in the name of the East End has done to oppose Crossrail in the period under review
The ‘local paper’ the East London Idiotiser has lied for Crossrail again.
How is it that the crooks who brought into the East End the Crossrail hole attack, expected to get away with letting the community down, destroying vital parts of the area?
By assuming that the ‘local paper’ the East London advertiser, would take another century to catch up with the pace and the plan, that is how ! And so it is proving, the Idiotiser simply cannot get the facts. Or it cannot tell the truth of what is going on. It is forever shielding the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and totally unwisely over-hyping the alleged salvation of the area by ‘councillors’ ! There is no feting of the community Campaign against Crossrail in then Idiotiser. Whenever the Idiotiser has apparently ‘reported’ on the Campaign against Crsosrail, it has got key facts unforgivably misinformed, confusing and muddled up. May be there has been a n agenda active in that too!
The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Review of the local Council and of the local paper the East London Idiotiser
By Muhammad Haque
1200 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 September 2006
It has suppressed the fact that for days now Khoodeelaar! has been publicising the demonstration to be held against Crossrail on Friday 22 September 230067. In order to make it plausible that it is not misreporting, the Idiotiser carries two pieces on the topic of CrossRail but both of those are stuffed full of falsehoods and misinformation.
The Idiotiser contents further analysed at 1220 hrs GMT Thursday 21 September 2006 Crossrail forced to alter plans!
This is another typically false heading to an even more false 'report'.
The 'report's is empty of substance and is as usual contradictory.
Why?
Because it is a dishonest cover to give even more plugs to Crassrail, so that, there is another advertisement in the paper from the CLRL and its corrupt backers.
The Idiotiser uses words like 'forced' without evidence.
Big Business and 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are mixed up!
Or perhaps the Idiotiser 'knows' something we do not - that may be some of its unnamed collective 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are indeed in league with Big Business!
Who are these ‘campaigners’ that the Idiotiser does not name?
What are they campaigning on and about ?
Ion what evidence does the Idiotiser refer to them as ‘campaigners’ and on what date or dates did they do the alleged campaigning ?
How else could the Idiotiser print a stupid 'report' like that!
Only if the Idiotiser wanted to lie to the ordinary readers and deny the fact that Khoodeelaar! The Idiotiser has room for advertising the CLRL stunt but has no inclination to admit the truth about the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hoel campaign.
The central analytical premiss in the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been, long before the formal launch of the Campaign in january 2004, that the Crossrail hole plan is fundamentally flawed and that it was flawed in so far as the massive and long lasting negative impact on the community because it was devised to meet the demands for profit that Big Business represented.
The Idiotiser in its latest edition [Thursday 21 September 2006] has given space to the topic of Crossrail under pressure from the community. But it has signally failed to tell the truth .
It has done bits here, bits there, including giving almost a page to a ‘campaigner’ near the Whitechapel station. But it has refused to tell the truth about the CRASSrail.
Now, it has accommodate4d the CrossRail hole Bill tout John Biggs in a disguise that Biggs is wearing as a ‘concerned’ member on the GLA. That concern is false as is everything that Biggs has entered in his career as a Blairist self-seeker and time-server.
But the Idiotiser will not let readers have any knowledge of Biggs’ role in bring the CrossRail hole into the East End.
Just like the Idiotiser will not tell the truth that Christine Gilbert was repeatedly called a liar in the Council chamber and that neither the ‘chair ‘ of the meeting nor a single member of the Council on either side of the so-called divide said a single thing in refuting that charge that Gilbert was a liar.
How dare the Idiotiser prance about plugging the lying Council clique as if it has been thanked by any genuine member of the community engaged in defending the community against any of the clique’s attacks?
In any case, there is NO councillor who has initiated and sustained ANY campaign in the corrupt cliqued Council on any side.
Whoever the Idiotiser may dig up will turn out to have been a product of some other elements and organisations.
So to again parade the idea of ‘councillor’ as a superior source of opinion or action is doubly contaminating and corrupt.
It is the community that has the priority and should be given it every time the Idiotiser pretends to be reporting about the conduct of the council.
The Idiotiser must also beware: do not behave corruptly and do not do ‘personal favours’ to ‘selected campaigners’ about whom the Idiotiser decision-making ;’editorial’ [!] personnel may be operating some strange ‘priority’!!!
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole mayor Ken Lyingstill Livingstone – an update on the latest Crassness by careerist Ken
Why CrossRail hole Christine Gilbert should have been sacked from Tower Hamlets Council and why that display [in the 'FOOL Council' staged on Wednesday 13 September 2006 in the 'Council Chamber'] of ‘opposition grouplette leaders’ oozing praise for Gilbert was a disgraceful abuse of the councillors’ positions….. Why those ‘opposition councillors’ owe an apology to all the people let down and violated by Christine Gilbert in Tower Hamlets over the past years that she has been in the post as ‘chief executive’…
How CROSSRAIL hole was INVITED to Tower Hamlets by the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council which has been allowed to CREATE additional poverty in the East End by its corrupt agenda and by its collusion with the most corrupt elements in the area both brought into Tower Hamlets by some of the crooks with 'influence' over the corrupt councillors belonging to the corrupt clique in control of the Council and by other illicit ways...Why Crossrail hole will spell disaster for so many families, so many young people, so many senior persons and for the entire social and economic lives of the people in the community in the East End of London... And why Crossrail is NOT needed by the local economy...
Will the ‘Opposition’ councillors show any morality to call for the sacking of the corrupt employees including some in the Tower Hamlets Council's planning operations who are directly abusing their employment in the Council and must be working to the agenda of multi-national corporations and Big business who want to go through the planning formalities so they can make the local people even more deprived than the people already are and so that the Big Business muggers can embark on making huge and illegitimate profits while they deplete the stock in public control of the buildings and amenities that should be made usable by the ordinary people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets? Or are all the RELEVANT ‘opposition’ ‘councillors’ so morally compromised by their own corrupt deals here and there, by their recent corrupt deals etc that they do not have the courage to speak out against crooked agents of Big Business installed within Tower Hamlets Council?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Brighton Postcard has now been postponed due to the Khoodeelaar! breaking commentary and Campaign reports
Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against CrossRail stunt in Hanbury Street – revised time for gathering outside Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 on Friday 22 September 2006: Gather outside the Brady Centre at 2.30 PM [1430 hrs Local time] Friday 22 September 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 report by Muhammad Haque at 2030 hrs GMT Wednesday 20 September 2006
John Biggs speaking out against Crossrail ! Pass on the sick bag! Even better if Biggs has the courage and the conviction to support the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against Crassrail outside the Brady Centre on 22 September 2006 .
M
Somehow he won’t support the demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street on Friday … This is because of Biggs’ failure to tell the truth about the crassness of CrossRail that he has been aware of. Or rather, has been made aware of all along… I recall trying, in vain, to get the corrupt ‘ executive’ committee members on the then GMC [General management Committee!] of the former Labour Party remnants in Bethnal Green to have an open and detailed discussion on the Crassrail plan as it was being promoted within the Blaired sections of the former Labour Party…But they were deaf to reason… They lost the ability to see.. and they lied through their every known presumed human thinking [!] faculty… And for what! How many of those immoral time servers have anything to show by way of anything they have done in their pathetic careeristic times within the Blaired party that makes any difference for the better for the community in whose name they constantly and only make pathetic careeristic points? Those bureaucrats backed Biggs overtime that I sought to create an intelligent debate within the Blaired bureaucracy. Biggs is on the Greater London Assembly because there is no political organisation of any party. Least of all, there is no politically active Labour Party in the Borough. What there is in its place is a soulless, morality- free Blaired organism that has taken over the former Labour party… Biggs is a small time careerist. He has not shown any morality,. Any vision. Any anything… He is only now making the pathetic noise because there are other facts at stake and he is clarity enough to know which way the political wind is likely to bow.. so he can move with it and keep his pathetic career, for now at the GLA. Ghastly Lying Apparatus. Biggs should be held to account by the East End and we intend to make sure that Biggs does not get away with the latest round of lying for Crossrail…We shall be focussing on the strange allegedly anti-CrossRail allegedly campaigning prances and other disgracefully tokenistic, insincere, unrepresentative [context. context] conduct by the Blaring crooks at the expense of the community in the ordinary p[arts of Bow East…
Why has Christine Gilbert been lying to and against the community in the East End of London? Who authorised Christine Gilbert to sabotage e-mail communications? Who told Christine Gilbert that she could show two fingers to the people in whose name she has been making so much cash and collecting so many career points for herself over the past decade or so?
Why has ‘Brick Lane’ Councillor Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ been silent on the CrossRail hole in the Hanbury Street?
Who told Michael Keith’s ‘ethnic’ ‘mate’ to say that the people would not oppose Crossrail if the facts were explained to the people? What is there to explain about a hole that will disrupt essential traffic of customers and community in the area for anything upto two years? What is there to explain about a hole that will cause serious noise pollution for as long? What is there to explain about a hole that will only sink small business in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1, turning Hanbury Street into a blighted wasteland? …Who briefed that ‘community’ ‘leader’ to parrot their racist Crossrail-hole-inviting ‘friend’?
[To be continued]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Muhammad Haque's questions to Tory Chair Francis Maude - April 2006: Has Francis Maude behaved any better than Alistair Darling over CrossRail hole in Brick Lane? - a review here soon
Lib Dems or Lib Dumbs! What is all this 'ladies' shouting sexually suggestive statements in the so-called political conference! Is this a party fit to claim it is any better than the Sleazeball setup that Blair has created in the formerly known Labour Party? - an ethical report on the adulterous outrages at Brighton Lib Dems outing
From the previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
BRIGHTON POSTCARD! Crossrail Chris Huhne! What a plonker! He is claiming that his ‘party’ is almost ready to grab the formal political power in the UK! Does that make him a plonker?
The Muhammad Haque Daily Political Commentary 1700 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 19 September 2006
No, it doesn’t! except that Chris the obscenely overrated Huhne is not capable of understanding the full facts of office. Not as far as any legitimate claim he may make to being different from the lying Blairing regime or the creepy Cameron variety. Chris Huhne hasn’t got the moral integrity to claim that he deserved the trust of the people any more than any of the incumbents in various offices of the UK state do… So what is the link? The link is that a few months back, before they plunged into the latest annual grotesque indulgence of the summer recess, the so-called MPs including Huhne got into an exchange of sorts.
According to the sources that Khoodeelaar! regularly examines as part of our constitutional law work against Crossrail, we came across what looked like Huhne’s having made a small statement about Crossrail. Literally, that published statement was incredibly fudgy and confusing.
It showed Huhne's lack of the requisite knowledge of the subject. Or his statement was so mercilessly misstated that it immediately warranted a fact-checker communication. Without checking the alleged facts about his utterance, we would not be commenting on what he had to then say about Crossrail or about the macro economy. Or about the wider environment of planet earth. . As is the established ethical tradition of this KHOODEELAAR! campaigning publication, we wrote to Huhne. Asking him to first of all confirm the attributed statement. And then we would have followed up with a few original questions about the Crass role that his so-called leadership had played in plugging for the CRASSRAIL project. So what did Huhne have to say? Nought. He did not even bother to acknowledge the communication. Far less to show any appreciation of the fact that we took the trouble to ask him to confirm the statement… Now what does that show? Does that show that Huhne bothers about what he must have been given to believe a small local grouping in the East End of London? Or does it show that he is so up-to-date with what the WHOLE community of people across the UK is on about that he does indeed deserve to be taken very seriously as the man that should be in charge of making mega decisions on behalf of the people on the matters of serious environmental and economic and social import?
[To be continued]
The previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
AADHIKARonline
publishing programme for Tuesday 19 September 2006
Khoodeelaar! protest demonstration against Crossrail hole company , 3PM Friday 22 September 2006 outside the Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 [More details during the next 3 days on this site and on http://www.khoodeelaar.com]
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 reports [continued] What do Tower Hamlets Council ‘opposition’ ‘groups’ say against corrupt links between ‘councillors’ and employees/agents of the Tower Hamlets Council? Do the ‘opposition’ councillors have ANY position against corruption? If so, what is that position? If there is a stated position or a position that can be stated, when and where was that last published for the people in the East End of London?
By Muhammad Haque London 1220 Hrs GMT Tuesday 19 September 2006
Why did Crossrail-hole-mayor ‘Shafiqul’ state a threat to ‘permanently ban’ anyone who made a racist remark in the Council chamber on 13 September 2006? Wasn’t’ he obliged under the rules and the constitution and legally to show to all present what evidence he was basing his apparently anti-racist utterance on? Or was that another of the corrupt clique’s ploys to abuse the Council chamber in order to deter genuine contributions against the corrupt clique's corrupt conduct? Since when had the corrupt racist clique on Tower Hamlets Council become so concerned AGAINST racism? Will the Blairing time-servers who gave ‘mayor’ Shafiqul the partisan, sleazy prod to make that utterance identify what racist remark they were referring to? Or will they, - - in the event of their predictable failure and or refusal to substantiate the presumed factual basis underlying that stunt- apologise to the people of the East End for abusing the name of the East End population and electorate in furthering the petty, corrupt, careers of the time-serving Blairing post-holders themselves?
The further evidence of the corrupt agenda behind the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the post of ‘chief executive’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Whatever happened to the ‘campaign against corruption’ that had been so loudly announced by George Galloway the ‘leader’ of the RESPECT grouping?
Breaking news on the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against CrossRail
How Tower Hamlets Council has been CREATING poverty in the ‘deprived’ East End of London
How Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy lied about ‘funding’ ‘community organisation’s – the truth about the CORRUPT practice of Tower Hamlets Council under ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert
Postcard from Brighton ? How glossy is the attached image?
London Thursday 21 September 2006 2006
The 4th Edition published from London at 1300 Hrs GMT / 1400 Hrs UK time on Thursday 21 September 2006
Editor in Chief
Muhammad Haque
Moral and legal statement about the materials published here and about access and references to them All materials published here are originally created and authored unless otherwise stated [eg external links and comparable evidence of participation or contribution by other authoring and analytical sources] publishing these online editions in association with KHOODEELAAR! The BRICK LANE AND WHITECHAPEL LONDON E1 AREA CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE CROSSRAIL hole tunnel plot scheme plan Bill attacks on the East End of London
AADHIKAR MEDIA FOUNDATION
[1980 - 2006]
Language note: The word AADHIKAR means RIGHTS in several major Asian languages. The word Aadhikar was introduced into English by Muhammad Haque in December 1980. The spelling with two 'a's had not been seen in the context before. It was first published as part of the title and description of the weekly AADHIKAR on Monday 19 December 1980
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LINKS:
View HERE the main web site of the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole… Bill campaign [Khoodeelaar.com]
AADHIKARonline some recent editions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NO to a Crossrail hole in Hanbury Street: Khoodeelaar! demonstration against Crossrail in hanbury Street at 3 PM on Friday 22 September 2006
Details of the demo: Gather outside the ‘Brady Centre’ in Hanbury Street at 2.30 PM
Demo starts at 3 PM with updates on the campaign against CrossRail hole.
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Reports, including focussing on what any of the ‘elected’ postholders in the name of the East End has done to oppose Crossrail in the period under review
The ‘local paper’ the East London Idiotiser has lied for Crossrail again.
How is it that the crooks who brought into the East End the Crossrail hole attack, expected to get away with letting the community down, destroying vital parts of the area?
By assuming that the ‘local paper’ the East London advertiser, would take another century to catch up with the pace and the plan, that is how ! And so it is proving, the Idiotiser simply cannot get the facts. Or it cannot tell the truth of what is going on. It is forever shielding the corrupt Tower Hamlets Council and totally unwisely over-hyping the alleged salvation of the area by ‘councillors’ ! There is no feting of the community Campaign against Crossrail in then Idiotiser. Whenever the Idiotiser has apparently ‘reported’ on the Campaign against Crsosrail, it has got key facts unforgivably misinformed, confusing and muddled up. May be there has been a n agenda active in that too!
The Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 Review of the local Council and of the local paper the East London Idiotiser
By Muhammad Haque
1200 Hrs GMT London Thursday 21 September 2006
It has suppressed the fact that for days now Khoodeelaar! has been publicising the demonstration to be held against Crossrail on Friday 22 September 230067. In order to make it plausible that it is not misreporting, the Idiotiser carries two pieces on the topic of CrossRail but both of those are stuffed full of falsehoods and misinformation.
The Idiotiser contents further analysed at 1220 hrs GMT Thursday 21 September 2006 Crossrail forced to alter plans!
This is another typically false heading to an even more false 'report'.
The 'report's is empty of substance and is as usual contradictory.
Why?
Because it is a dishonest cover to give even more plugs to Crassrail, so that, there is another advertisement in the paper from the CLRL and its corrupt backers.
The Idiotiser uses words like 'forced' without evidence.
Big Business and 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are mixed up!
Or perhaps the Idiotiser 'knows' something we do not - that may be some of its unnamed collective 'campaigners in Spitalfields' are indeed in league with Big Business!
Who are these ‘campaigners’ that the Idiotiser does not name?
What are they campaigning on and about ?
Ion what evidence does the Idiotiser refer to them as ‘campaigners’ and on what date or dates did they do the alleged campaigning ?
How else could the Idiotiser print a stupid 'report' like that!
Only if the Idiotiser wanted to lie to the ordinary readers and deny the fact that Khoodeelaar! The Idiotiser has room for advertising the CLRL stunt but has no inclination to admit the truth about the Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hoel campaign.
The central analytical premiss in the Khoodeelaar! campaign has been, long before the formal launch of the Campaign in january 2004, that the Crossrail hole plan is fundamentally flawed and that it was flawed in so far as the massive and long lasting negative impact on the community because it was devised to meet the demands for profit that Big Business represented.
The Idiotiser in its latest edition [Thursday 21 September 2006] has given space to the topic of Crossrail under pressure from the community. But it has signally failed to tell the truth .
It has done bits here, bits there, including giving almost a page to a ‘campaigner’ near the Whitechapel station. But it has refused to tell the truth about the CRASSrail.
Now, it has accommodate4d the CrossRail hole Bill tout John Biggs in a disguise that Biggs is wearing as a ‘concerned’ member on the GLA. That concern is false as is everything that Biggs has entered in his career as a Blairist self-seeker and time-server.
But the Idiotiser will not let readers have any knowledge of Biggs’ role in bring the CrossRail hole into the East End.
Just like the Idiotiser will not tell the truth that Christine Gilbert was repeatedly called a liar in the Council chamber and that neither the ‘chair ‘ of the meeting nor a single member of the Council on either side of the so-called divide said a single thing in refuting that charge that Gilbert was a liar.
How dare the Idiotiser prance about plugging the lying Council clique as if it has been thanked by any genuine member of the community engaged in defending the community against any of the clique’s attacks?
In any case, there is NO councillor who has initiated and sustained ANY campaign in the corrupt cliqued Council on any side.
Whoever the Idiotiser may dig up will turn out to have been a product of some other elements and organisations.
So to again parade the idea of ‘councillor’ as a superior source of opinion or action is doubly contaminating and corrupt.
It is the community that has the priority and should be given it every time the Idiotiser pretends to be reporting about the conduct of the council.
The Idiotiser must also beware: do not behave corruptly and do not do ‘personal favours’ to ‘selected campaigners’ about whom the Idiotiser decision-making ;’editorial’ [!] personnel may be operating some strange ‘priority’!!!
Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole mayor Ken Lyingstill Livingstone – an update on the latest Crassness by careerist Ken
Why CrossRail hole Christine Gilbert should have been sacked from Tower Hamlets Council and why that display [in the 'FOOL Council' staged on Wednesday 13 September 2006 in the 'Council Chamber'] of ‘opposition grouplette leaders’ oozing praise for Gilbert was a disgraceful abuse of the councillors’ positions….. Why those ‘opposition councillors’ owe an apology to all the people let down and violated by Christine Gilbert in Tower Hamlets over the past years that she has been in the post as ‘chief executive’…
How CROSSRAIL hole was INVITED to Tower Hamlets by the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council which has been allowed to CREATE additional poverty in the East End by its corrupt agenda and by its collusion with the most corrupt elements in the area both brought into Tower Hamlets by some of the crooks with 'influence' over the corrupt councillors belonging to the corrupt clique in control of the Council and by other illicit ways...Why Crossrail hole will spell disaster for so many families, so many young people, so many senior persons and for the entire social and economic lives of the people in the community in the East End of London... And why Crossrail is NOT needed by the local economy...
Will the ‘Opposition’ councillors show any morality to call for the sacking of the corrupt employees including some in the Tower Hamlets Council's planning operations who are directly abusing their employment in the Council and must be working to the agenda of multi-national corporations and Big business who want to go through the planning formalities so they can make the local people even more deprived than the people already are and so that the Big Business muggers can embark on making huge and illegitimate profits while they deplete the stock in public control of the buildings and amenities that should be made usable by the ordinary people in the Borough of Tower Hamlets? Or are all the RELEVANT ‘opposition’ ‘councillors’ so morally compromised by their own corrupt deals here and there, by their recent corrupt deals etc that they do not have the courage to speak out against crooked agents of Big Business installed within Tower Hamlets Council?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Brighton Postcard has now been postponed due to the Khoodeelaar! breaking commentary and Campaign reports
Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against CrossRail stunt in Hanbury Street – revised time for gathering outside Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 on Friday 22 September 2006: Gather outside the Brady Centre at 2.30 PM [1430 hrs Local time] Friday 22 September 2006
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 report by Muhammad Haque at 2030 hrs GMT Wednesday 20 September 2006
John Biggs speaking out against Crossrail ! Pass on the sick bag! Even better if Biggs has the courage and the conviction to support the Khoodeelaar! Demonstration against Crassrail outside the Brady Centre on 22 September 2006 .
M
Somehow he won’t support the demonstration against Crossrail in Hanbury Street on Friday … This is because of Biggs’ failure to tell the truth about the crassness of CrossRail that he has been aware of. Or rather, has been made aware of all along… I recall trying, in vain, to get the corrupt ‘ executive’ committee members on the then GMC [General management Committee!] of the former Labour Party remnants in Bethnal Green to have an open and detailed discussion on the Crassrail plan as it was being promoted within the Blaired sections of the former Labour Party…But they were deaf to reason… They lost the ability to see.. and they lied through their every known presumed human thinking [!] faculty… And for what! How many of those immoral time servers have anything to show by way of anything they have done in their pathetic careeristic times within the Blaired party that makes any difference for the better for the community in whose name they constantly and only make pathetic careeristic points? Those bureaucrats backed Biggs overtime that I sought to create an intelligent debate within the Blaired bureaucracy. Biggs is on the Greater London Assembly because there is no political organisation of any party. Least of all, there is no politically active Labour Party in the Borough. What there is in its place is a soulless, morality- free Blaired organism that has taken over the former Labour party… Biggs is a small time careerist. He has not shown any morality,. Any vision. Any anything… He is only now making the pathetic noise because there are other facts at stake and he is clarity enough to know which way the political wind is likely to bow.. so he can move with it and keep his pathetic career, for now at the GLA. Ghastly Lying Apparatus. Biggs should be held to account by the East End and we intend to make sure that Biggs does not get away with the latest round of lying for Crossrail…We shall be focussing on the strange allegedly anti-CrossRail allegedly campaigning prances and other disgracefully tokenistic, insincere, unrepresentative [context. context] conduct by the Blaring crooks at the expense of the community in the ordinary p[arts of Bow East…
Why has Christine Gilbert been lying to and against the community in the East End of London? Who authorised Christine Gilbert to sabotage e-mail communications? Who told Christine Gilbert that she could show two fingers to the people in whose name she has been making so much cash and collecting so many career points for herself over the past decade or so?
Why has ‘Brick Lane’ Councillor Abbas Uddin ‘Helal’ been silent on the CrossRail hole in the Hanbury Street?
Who told Michael Keith’s ‘ethnic’ ‘mate’ to say that the people would not oppose Crossrail if the facts were explained to the people? What is there to explain about a hole that will disrupt essential traffic of customers and community in the area for anything upto two years? What is there to explain about a hole that will cause serious noise pollution for as long? What is there to explain about a hole that will only sink small business in the Brick Lane and Whitechapel London E1, turning Hanbury Street into a blighted wasteland? …Who briefed that ‘community’ ‘leader’ to parrot their racist Crossrail-hole-inviting ‘friend’?
[To be continued]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Muhammad Haque's questions to Tory Chair Francis Maude - April 2006: Has Francis Maude behaved any better than Alistair Darling over CrossRail hole in Brick Lane? - a review here soon
Lib Dems or Lib Dumbs! What is all this 'ladies' shouting sexually suggestive statements in the so-called political conference! Is this a party fit to claim it is any better than the Sleazeball setup that Blair has created in the formerly known Labour Party? - an ethical report on the adulterous outrages at Brighton Lib Dems outing
From the previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
BRIGHTON POSTCARD! Crossrail Chris Huhne! What a plonker! He is claiming that his ‘party’ is almost ready to grab the formal political power in the UK! Does that make him a plonker?
The Muhammad Haque Daily Political Commentary 1700 Hrs GMT London Tuesday 19 September 2006
No, it doesn’t! except that Chris the obscenely overrated Huhne is not capable of understanding the full facts of office. Not as far as any legitimate claim he may make to being different from the lying Blairing regime or the creepy Cameron variety. Chris Huhne hasn’t got the moral integrity to claim that he deserved the trust of the people any more than any of the incumbents in various offices of the UK state do… So what is the link? The link is that a few months back, before they plunged into the latest annual grotesque indulgence of the summer recess, the so-called MPs including Huhne got into an exchange of sorts.
According to the sources that Khoodeelaar! regularly examines as part of our constitutional law work against Crossrail, we came across what looked like Huhne’s having made a small statement about Crossrail. Literally, that published statement was incredibly fudgy and confusing.
It showed Huhne's lack of the requisite knowledge of the subject. Or his statement was so mercilessly misstated that it immediately warranted a fact-checker communication. Without checking the alleged facts about his utterance, we would not be commenting on what he had to then say about Crossrail or about the macro economy. Or about the wider environment of planet earth. . As is the established ethical tradition of this KHOODEELAAR! campaigning publication, we wrote to Huhne. Asking him to first of all confirm the attributed statement. And then we would have followed up with a few original questions about the Crass role that his so-called leadership had played in plugging for the CRASSRAIL project. So what did Huhne have to say? Nought. He did not even bother to acknowledge the communication. Far less to show any appreciation of the fact that we took the trouble to ask him to confirm the statement… Now what does that show? Does that show that Huhne bothers about what he must have been given to believe a small local grouping in the East End of London? Or does it show that he is so up-to-date with what the WHOLE community of people across the UK is on about that he does indeed deserve to be taken very seriously as the man that should be in charge of making mega decisions on behalf of the people on the matters of serious environmental and economic and social import?
[To be continued]
The previous editions of AADHIKARonline as published on Tuesday 19 September 2006
AADHIKARonline
publishing programme for Tuesday 19 September 2006
Khoodeelaar! protest demonstration against Crossrail hole company , 3PM Friday 22 September 2006 outside the Brady Centre, Hanbury Street London E1 [More details during the next 3 days on this site and on http://www.khoodeelaar.com]
Khoodeelaar! Manifesto 2006 reports [continued] What do Tower Hamlets Council ‘opposition’ ‘groups’ say against corrupt links between ‘councillors’ and employees/agents of the Tower Hamlets Council? Do the ‘opposition’ councillors have ANY position against corruption? If so, what is that position? If there is a stated position or a position that can be stated, when and where was that last published for the people in the East End of London?
By Muhammad Haque London 1220 Hrs GMT Tuesday 19 September 2006
Why did Crossrail-hole-mayor ‘Shafiqul’ state a threat to ‘permanently ban’ anyone who made a racist remark in the Council chamber on 13 September 2006? Wasn’t’ he obliged under the rules and the constitution and legally to show to all present what evidence he was basing his apparently anti-racist utterance on? Or was that another of the corrupt clique’s ploys to abuse the Council chamber in order to deter genuine contributions against the corrupt clique's corrupt conduct? Since when had the corrupt racist clique on Tower Hamlets Council become so concerned AGAINST racism? Will the Blairing time-servers who gave ‘mayor’ Shafiqul the partisan, sleazy prod to make that utterance identify what racist remark they were referring to? Or will they, - - in the event of their predictable failure and or refusal to substantiate the presumed factual basis underlying that stunt- apologise to the people of the East End for abusing the name of the East End population and electorate in furthering the petty, corrupt, careers of the time-serving Blairing post-holders themselves?
The further evidence of the corrupt agenda behind the appointment of Christine Gilbert to the post of ‘chief executive’ in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council
Whatever happened to the ‘campaign against corruption’ that had been so loudly announced by George Galloway the ‘leader’ of the RESPECT grouping?
Breaking news on the Khoodeelaar! Campaign against CrossRail
How Tower Hamlets Council has been CREATING poverty in the ‘deprived’ East End of London
How Tower Hamlets Council bureaucracy lied about ‘funding’ ‘community organisation’s – the truth about the CORRUPT practice of Tower Hamlets Council under ‘chief executive’ Christine Gilbert
Postcard from Brighton ? How glossy is the attached image?
